@ARTICLE{Samulska2026:i9039,
	author="{Samulska, Katarzyna}",
	title="{Sposoby zaskarżenia decyzji nadleśniczego o ustaleniu odszkodowania za szkody łowieckie}",
	year="2026",
	type="artykuł naukowy",
	language="pl",
	journal="{Radca Prawny}",
	issn="2392-1943",
	volume="46",
	number="1",
	pages="27--40",
	doi="10.4467/23921943RP.26.002.23278",
	url="https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/radca-prawny/artykul/sposoby-zaskarzenia-decyzji-nadlesniczego-o-ustaleniu-odszkodowania-za-szkody-lowieckie",
	keywords="decyzja nadleśniczego; szkody łowieckie; tryby nadzwyczajne; powództwo do sądu powszechnego; skarga do sądu administracyjnego; forest district manager’s decision; hunting damage; extraordinary procedures; action before a common court; complaint to an administrative court",
	abstract="{This article addresses the issue of appealing a forest district manager’s decision to determine compensation for hunting damage. The article analyzes the procedures for issuing decisions by the forest district in this area and the procedures for appealing them. It reviews administrative courts’ case law regarding the admissibility of appealing a forest district manager’s decision in cases in-
volving compensation for hunting damage in extraordinary proceedings, i.e., by reopening the proceedings, declaring the decision invalid, or repealing or amending it. The article also indicates whether a forest district manager’s decision may be appealed to an administrative court or a common court, within what timeframe, and under what conditions.}",
}
