Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download BibTeX

Title

Preliminary Studies into Cutting of a Novel Two Component 3D-Printed Stainless Steel–Polymer Composite Material by Abrasive Water Jet

Authors

[ 1 ] Akademia im. Jakuba z Paradyża | [ P ] employee

Scientific discipline (Law 2.0)

[2.3] Information and communication technology
[2.9] Mechanical engineering

Year of publication

2023

Published in

Materials

Journal year: 2023 | Journal volume: 16 | Journal number: 3

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
  • abrasive water jet
  • cutting
  • metal–polymer composite
  • modeling
  • optimization
Abstract

EN Composites are materials with a heterogeneous structure, composed of two or more components with different properties. The properties of composites are never the sum or average of the properties of their components. There is a lot of research and many models on the different property assessments of composite materials. Composites are used as construction materials in key areas of technology, including in civil and mechanical engineering, aviation and space technology, and others. This work presents a modern composite material created with 3D-printing technology using the SLM method, and the possibility of its processing with one of the advanced manufacturing technologies, i.e., the Abrasive Water Jet (AWJ). Tests planned using DoE methods were carried out by changing control parameters such as the pressure, abrasive flow, and traverse speed. As a dependent parameter, the surface roughness parameter Sq (squared mean height) was selected and measured in different places of the cut composite. Based on the S/N ratio, the most favorable control parameters of the cutting process were also determined to achieve the lowest roughness of the cut surface. A clear effect of the controlled cutting process on the surface roughness was observed, as well as roughness variation for the metal and polymer component. In addition, the contact surface of the polymer with the metal in the cut zone was analyzed. Analysis of the contact surfaces on the microscope showed that the gap between the polymer–metal contact surfaces does not exceed 2.5 μm.

Pages (from - to)

1170(1) - 1170(14)

DOI

10.3390/ma16031170

URL

https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/16/3/1170

License type

CC BY (attribution alone)

Open Access Mode

open journal

Open Access Text Version

final published version

Release date

30.01.2023

Date of Open Access to the publication

at the time of publication

Ministry points / journal

140